Selecting the Right UPS for the Project: A Guide for Project Managers

Selecting the Right UPS for the Project: A Guide for Project Managers

In the current digital era, continuity of power is very essential for the continuous run of several mission-critical systems found in many industries. UPS systems are critical to prevent any misbehavior in power or its failure from causing a disruption in business operation. Being a project manager, picking up the right UPS is very critical in terms of balancing cost and efficiency with reliability to meet present and future power demand.

This article serves as a guide in selecting appropriate UPS and recommends where Lithium-ion and Sealed Maintenance-Free batteries should be used.

---

Understanding UPS Systems and Configurations

UPS systems come in various configurations and capacities, designed to protect different types of loads. Two common configurations are N+1 and N:

• N+1 Configuration: This configuration allows for one or multiple standby UPS units in case the primary ones fail. What this means is that in the event of a failure of any UPS, the other will take over duty without causing an interruption to the supply of power. This applies to the mission-critical environment whereby any second could mean monumental losses.
• N Configuration: This configuration indicates that a single UPS carries the entire load without redundancy. It is cost-effective but carries extra risk in case of failure of the UPS. This setup is suitable for applications that are not critical and where occasional downtime is acceptable.

The right configuration depends on the criticality of the systems that the UPS is going to support. For example, a data center or a hospital would definitely call for an N+1 configuration, while a small office might use an N configuration to save money.

---

Comparing SMF and Lithium-ion Batteries

Of the many decisions involved in specifying a UPS, few are as critical as that between SMF and lithium-ion batteries; each has different advantages and disadvantages depending on the application.

SMF Batteries: These are the conventional lead-acid batteries, which have a record for their reliability and lower upfront cost. They find applications in various UPS systems. However, they have certain drawbacks, like requiring regular maintenance and a short life expectancy compared to Lithium-ion batteries. SMF batteries work best for applications where cost is of paramount importance and the infrastructure that will support the higher weight and footprint.

Lithium-ion Batteries: These are the new generation, advanced batteries that have several advantages over SMF batteries, such as a long life of up to 15 years, lower weight, and smaller footprint. While it is higher at the starting point, TCO could be low, driven by lowered maintenance and replacement frequency. Lithium-ion batteries are used in high performance space-constrained or mission-critical applications.

---

Detailed Comparison Table: UPS Selection Parameters

Below is a comparison of some key parameters of UPS systems that are based on SMF and Lithium-ion batteries, respectively, to consider in reaching a decision.

 

Parameter	SMF Battery-Based UPS	Lithium-ion Battery-Based UPS
UPS Capacity (kVA)	10 kVA - 500 kVA	10 kVA - 500 kVA
Weight (per kVA)	20-30 kg/kVA	10-15 kg/kVA
Weight (per sqm)	200-300 kg/sqm	100-150 kg/sqm
Footprint (sqm per kVA)	0.015-0.020 sqm/kVA	0.008-0.012 sqm/kVA
Battery Lifespan	3-5 years	10-15 years
Battery Weight (per kVA)	25-40 kg/kVA	7-12 kg/kVA
Total System Weight (UPS + Battery)	45-70 kg/kVA	17-27 kg/kVA
Charging Time (80% Capacity)	6-12 hours	1-2 hours
Operating Temperature Range	0°C to 40°C	-20°C to 60°C
UPS Efficiency at Full Load	93-96%	94-98%
UPS Configuration - N+1	It offers redundancy and is suitable for critical loads where reliability is key. It can very easily add 25% more to the available total capacity.	Offers redundancy. Perfect usage in data centers and industry, where any kind of downtime is not acceptable, because it gives approximately 25% more to the total capacity.
UPS Configuration - N	A single UPS without redundancy is cheap but still a bit riskier. It can be used on applications that are not very critical.	Single UPS: reduces space and weight, increases initial costs, and decreases the total cost of ownership.
Initial Cost	Lower initial cost	Higher initial cost
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)	Higher TCO due to frequent maintenance and battery replacements	Lower TCO due to longer lifespan and minimal maintenance
UPS Configuration - N	Single UPS without redundancy; cost-effective but with higher risk; suitable for non-critical applications.	Single UPS without redundancy; offers space and weight savings with higher initial costs but lower TCO.
Bank Configuration - Single Bank	Batteries are connected in a single string; more vulnerable to total failure if one battery fails.	Single bank setup is lighter and more space-efficient but with similar vulnerabilities as SMF.
Bank Configuration - Dual Bank	It has two independent strings of batteries; provides redundancy; one string can support the load if another fails, offering higher reliability.	A lithium-ion dual-bank setup provides better reliability with a smaller footprint and is well-suited for use in mission-critical applications.

 

---

Key Considerations for Selecting UPS and Battery Types

When deciding between SMF and Lithium-ion batteries, consider the following factors:

1.    Weight Distribution: This is a factor of great concern, especially on high-rise building sites or floor load restricted sites, where the amount of weight the UPS system and batteries are allowed to have per square meter is regulated. Lithium-ion batteries are preferred for their lighter mass.

2.    Footprint: Many of today's facilities are tight on space. Lithium-ion UPS systems are of a smaller footprint and hence suited for tight locations or sites where efficiency in space is paramount.

3.    Battery Life and Maintenance: The life of a lithium-ion battery is far higher than that of an SMF battery. They can service up to 15 years, whereas the former ones are replaced within 3-5 years. This reduces the number of replacements and associated downtimes—a very important advantage in continuous operating environments.

4.    Charging Time: Fast recovery at those places where there are frequent power disturbances is desirable. Lithium-ion batteries charge faster than SMF batteries—80% capacity is reached within 1-2 hours, whereas attaining the same in SMF batteries takes 6-12 hours.

5.    Cost Factors: Even though Li-ion batteries are costly upfront, their low maintenance burden and long life make them more often than not better in terms of TCO. On the other hand, SMF batteries have more reasonable initial investment costs, although frequent replacements and maintenance measures raise long-term expenses.

6.    Bank Configuration: Most applications, intending to offer a very high level of reliability, duplicate the banks with either SMF or Lithium-ion batteries to improve redundancy in case of bank failure and, thus, handling the load when one goes down, making them highly appropriate for mission-critical environments.

---

Recommendations for Project Managers

·         Critical Applications: If you are running a project for critical systems, like data centers, hospitals, or financial institutions,, the configuration recommended would be an N+1 configuration with Lithium-ion batteries and a dual bank set up. This combination provides the highest possible level of reliability and efficiency, reducing the risk of downtime.

·         Non-Critical Applications: In less critical applications—very small offices or residential buildings—an N configuration with SMF batteries and a single bank setup may be more appropriate. It represents a cost/ performance balance in that it will provide a reliable power protection scheme without the added expense of redundancy.

·         Space-Constrained Environments: Where you have space and weight-constrained projects, a single-bank Lithium-ion battery configuration is better suited due to the small footprint and low weight of these batteries, which would help optimize the available space.

·         Budget-Conscious Projects: If the project budget is limited and the load is not critical, then a single-bank setup using SMF batteries would be more cost-effective. But consider the long-term ramification of maintenance and eventual replacement when choosing this route.

·

---

Conclusion

Proper selection of your UPS system is paramount; it will have long-term ramifications. Be able to choose a solution that truly serves the needs of your project—from knowing SMF vs. Lithium-ion batteries and how different UPS configurations and banks will impact your application.

Be it the high-stakes data center or a smaller office setup, what works is finding a balance among cost, efficiency, and reliability to ensure continued power against surprise outages. This guide shall help you surmount such complexities of UPS selection and hence make the right choice for your project.